35
By Justice Srem Sai
The Plaintiff/Applicant and his lawyers built their case on the allegation that the Chief Justice has assigned some “selected cases” to two Judges to hear during the legal vacation. So, they applied for an injunction against the two Judges.
In court, however, their own evidence shows that their allegation was a deliberate falsehood. Their Exhibit D shows that the CJ’s warrant was general and not specific to any particular case. Worse is Exhibit E, which shows that as many as 29 Judges (not 2) are sitting during the legal vacation.
The point, however, is that they have succeeded in preventing the courts from working for one week. Never underestimate the power of deliberate falsehood.
Da yie.
Source: newsthemegh.com